Wellbeing Quality Mark
Mental health support, physical wellbeing, pupil voice and agency, staff wellbeing, and the conditions for genuine belonging — for every person in…
ExploreWhole-school inclusion — from leadership and SEND support to family engagement and fairness for every pupil, regardless of background, disability, or identity.
The assessment areas
The Inclusion Quality Mark assesses 6 areas of school practice. Each is scored, and together they build a full picture of where your school is and where it can go next.
Whole-school inclusion — from leadership and SEND support to family engagement and fairness for every pupil, regardless of background, disability, or identity.
This quality mark assesses six areas of school practice. Each is scored, and together they build a full picture of where your school is and where it can go next.
Inclusive Quality Mark is available at Established, Advanced and Leading level. Each level reflects a genuinely different standard of embedded practice — not just more paperwork, but a meaningfully higher threshold. Reviews are conducted by independent practitioners with direct experience in this area, and every report is quality-checked before it reaches you.
The Inclusive Quality Mark framework covers six areas of school life. It works for UK state schools, independent schools, international schools, and alternative provision settings. Where English-specific terms come up, your reviewer finds the right equivalent for your context.
Every standard is rated red, amber or green against the level descriptors. Green means the practice meets the descriptor at that level. Your school completes an honest self-evaluation; your reviewer rates the same standards on the visit, and their ratings set the award.
Below is the detailed framework for the first areas, showing what Established, Advanced and Leading look like for each criterion. The full set of six areas with detailed criteria is provided once you register.
| Criterion | Established | Advanced | Leading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vision & Values | Inclusion is in the school’s plans. Leaders can say what it means in practice. | Inclusion shapes how the school plans and spends money. Leaders at all levels talk about it confidently. | Staff, families, and pupils have helped shape the school’s approach. Other schools come to learn from it. |
| Leadership | Someone in senior leadership is named as responsible for inclusion. That responsibility is visible. | Responsibility is shared across the team. Middle leaders take it seriously in their own areas. | Every level of leadership models inclusive practice. The school is growing the next generation of inclusive leaders. |
| Governance | Governors get regular updates. One governor has specific responsibility. | Governors look at inclusion data, ask hard questions, and hold leaders to account. | Inclusion is a standing item at board level with proper reporting. Governors have a deep understanding. |
| Staff Culture | Staff broadly believe inclusion is everyone’s job. The attitude is positive. | Inclusion is part of the fabric of the school. Staff challenge things that are not inclusive and are supported when they do. | The school is a genuinely inclusive workplace. Who you recruit and how you develop people reflects inclusive values. |
| Training | All staff get training at least once a year. New staff get it in their induction. | Training is regular, targeted, and tied to what the school is working on. Staff can point to things they have changed as a result. | Staff lead training for each other. Other schools come here for professional development on inclusion. |
| Policies & Accountability | Key policies are current and being used. Leaders can show the policy and practice match. | Policies are reviewed with input from staff, families, and pupils. There is clear accountability for making them happen. | Policies are shaped together with the school community. Impact is honestly evaluated and shared with others. |
| Criterion | Established | Advanced | Leading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spotting need early | There is a clear process for identifying children who need extra help, from the day they start. Everyone knows how to flag a concern. | The school uses attendance, assessment, and pastoral information together to catch things early rather than waiting for crises. | The school can point to specific children whose difficulties were caught and addressed before they got worse. |
| Plans & reviews | Support plans are current and the right people know what is in them. | Plans are high quality and actually change what happens for that child. Reviews involve the family and the child. | Plans are created with families and children. The school can show specifically how each plan has made a difference. |
| Provision mapping | There is a clear record of what support is in place for which children. | Provision mapping is used to check whether support is working and make decisions about resources. | The school can show the impact of every significant piece of support. Nothing is continued just because it has always been done. |
| Quality of support | Children with SEND get appropriate support. The inclusion lead or SENCO is qualified and accessible. | Support is working. Children make good progress. What is not working gets changed. | The inclusion lead drives inclusion across the whole school. Results for children with SEND are genuinely strong. |
| Transitions | When children move into or out of the school, important information travels with them. | Transitions are planned carefully with the child and family. The school works closely with wherever the child goes next. | The school has developed transition processes other schools use. Children with SEND move on without losing ground. |
| Working with services | Staff know how to get help from other agencies and use those routes when needed. | The school works well with external agencies. There is a clear record of what was arranged and what difference it made. | The school is an active, valued partner in its local network. It shapes the quality of services available to pupils. |
How the scoring works
Meets the descriptor at this level — secure, consistent and evidenced across the school.
Developing — in place in parts, but not yet secure across the whole school.
Not yet in place, or a significant gap to address.
Schools, trusts and groups can register their interest today. We will get back to you to talk through the process.
Tell us about your school and Shaun, our Founder and CEO, will get back to you. No pressure, no obligation, just a friendly chat about whether the Inclusion Quality Mark is right for you.
Just a few details and Shaun will be in touch.
Mental health support, physical wellbeing, pupil voice and agency, staff wellbeing, and the conditions for genuine belonging — for every person in…
ExploreStrategic leadership, staff development, distributed leadership, culture, accountability, and impact — what strong school leadership actually looks like from the inside, assessed…
ExploreSEND leadership, identification and assessment, quality of provision, teaching and learning, family partnerships, and outcomes for children with special educational needs and…
ExploreWe use cookies to run our website, understand how it's used and improve your experience. You can accept all cookies, reject non-essential ones, or set your preferences. Read our Cookie Policy.
Required for the website to function, including remembering your cookie choices. These cannot be switched off.
Help us understand how the site is used, so we can measure and improve it. Collected anonymously through Google Analytics.